Void decree against a lunatic makes execution sale incapable of passing title.

A decree passed against a person of unsound mind without appointment of a guardian ad litem under Order 32 Rule 15 CPC is treated as void and non est, because the court acts without jurisdiction. An execution sale founded on such a decree is also void ab initio and cannot confer title on the purchaser. The protections applicable to confirmation or setting aside of execution sales do not apply where no valid decree existed at the time of sale. On that basis, the challenge to the purchaser's title failed and the suit for possession was dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a decree passed against a lunatic without appointment of a guardian-ad-litem was a nullity and whether a sale in execution of such decree was void and incapable of conferring title.

Analysis: A decree against a person who is insane, passed without compliance with Order 32 Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure, is treated as one made without jurisdiction. Such a decree is void and non est, not merely voidable. A sale held in execution of a decree that is itself a nullity is likewise void ab initio, and a purchaser at such a sale acquires no rights. The protection afforded by the rules governing confirmation or setting aside of sales in execution does not apply where there was no valid decree in existence when the sale was held.

Conclusion: The decree against the lunatic was a nullity and the execution sale was void; no title passed to the purchaser.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the appellant's title failed, and the suit for possession was rightly dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: A decree passed against a lunatic without the guardian protection required by Order 32 Rule 15 of the Code of Civil Procedure is void and non est, and any sale in execution of such a decree is also void ab initio and confers no title.

---