Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a sale of immovable property in execution of a money decree can be confirmed when the decree under which the sale was held is set aside before confirmation.
Analysis: The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 contains a self-contained scheme for setting aside and confirming execution sales of immovable property. Where no successful application is made under Order XXI Rules 89 to 91, the court is bound under Rule 92 to confirm the sale, and upon confirmation the sale becomes absolute. Section 65 reinforces that the purchaser's title relates back to the date of sale. The absence of any express provision cancelling a sale merely because the decree was subsequently set aside, coupled with the policy of protecting bona fide auction purchasers so that execution sales attract bidders, supports confirmation of the sale. Relief, if any, to the judgment-debtor lies against the decree-holder under the procedure provided by the Code and not against an innocent stranger purchaser.
Conclusion: The sale was rightly confirmable notwithstanding the subsequent setting aside of the ex parte decree, and the appellant auction purchaser was entitled to confirmation of the sale.
Ratio Decidendi: A bona fide stranger auction purchaser at a valid execution sale is protected from the later reversal or setting aside of the decree, and the court must confirm the sale unless it is set aside within the specific remedies provided by Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.