Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code could be applied to a death that occurred before the provision was inserted, so as to require trial of the accused for dowry death by the Court of Session.
Analysis: Section 304-B was introduced by the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986 with effect from 19.11.1986 and created a distinct and more stringent substantive offence of dowry death, punishable with a minimum sentence of seven years and triable by the Court of Session. The related amendment in section 113-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was only a rule of proof for that new offence. Applying section 304-B to a death that occurred before its insertion would amount to giving retrospective effect to a penal provision and exposing the accused to a greater punishment than was permissible when the act was committed, which is barred by Article 20(1) of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: Section 304-B could not be applied to the present case, and the respondents could not be tried or punished for dowry death under that provision for an occurring before its commencement.
Ratio Decidendi: A penal provision creating a new substantive offence cannot be applied retrospectively to acts committed before its commencement, and Article 20(1) forbids conviction or enhanced punishment under the later law.