TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order discharging a probationary Indian Police Service officer, though couched as a discharge simpliciter under the probation rules, was in substance punitive and therefore attracted Article 311(2) of the Constitution.
Analysis: A termination of a probationer is not, by form alone, a punishment. The true character of the order depends on whether it is founded on misconduct, inefficiency, or other disqualifying conduct, and the Court is entitled to lift the veil of form to ascertain whether the order is merely a camouflage for punishment. Where the material shows that an enquiry was made into allegations of misconduct, explanations were called for, the recommendation for discharge was based on those allegations, and the impugned action would not have been taken but for the alleged misconduct, the order cannot be treated as a simple termination of probation. In such a case, the protection of Article 311(2) is attracted and a reasonable opportunity of defence is required.
Conclusion: The discharge order was punitive in substance, not a mere discharge simpliciter, and was invalid for non-compliance with Article 311(2). The finding is in favour of the appellant.
Ratio Decidendi: If the real foundation of a probationer's termination is misconduct or stigma, the Court may look beyond the form of the order and treat it as punitive, thereby requiring compliance with Article 311(2) of the Constitution of India.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
