TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds CIT(A) Order on Penalty for Concealment & Inaccurate Particulars</h1> The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealment of income and furnishing ... - Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2005-06.Summary:The revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order regarding the deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars. The A.O. imposed the penalty due to a claim not routed through Profit & Loss A/c, alleging willful tax evasion by the assessee.The assessee contended that concealment implies hiding income, while furnishing inaccurate particulars refers to providing non-conforming details. Incorrect claims do not constitute inaccurate particulars. The CIT(A) deleted the penalty, noting the assessee's explanation and supporting evidence for the deduction claimed as bad debt.The revenue appealed, emphasizing the A.O.'s findings. The assessee argued for upholding the CIT(A) order, citing continuous income declaration on the loan and the Supreme Court's ruling that disallowed claims do not automatically attract penalty u/s 271(1)(c).After considering the submissions and the Supreme Court's precedent, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order, concluding no interference was necessary. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
