<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1113 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars for the assessment year 2005-06. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that incorrect claims do not automatically attract the penalty, especially when supported by valid explanations and evidence, as in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 11:21:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=444762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1113 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A) order deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars for the assessment year 2005-06. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that incorrect claims do not automatically attract the penalty, especially when supported by valid explanations and evidence, as in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>