Administrative approval and beneficial circulars in income-tax acquisition proceedings: prima facie satisfaction and pending appeals

Under Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, the Commissioner's approval under section 269F(6) is an administrative approval based on the proposal and material placed before him, and does not require a draft acquisition order, reasons, or a hearing; on that basis, the approval was held valid. Section 269C requires only prima facie satisfaction on available material, and the valuation report was sufficient for that purpose. Beneficial Circular No. 455 was read to cover pending appellate proceedings as a continuation of the original acquisition proceedings, so the acquisition could not be sustained and the appeal failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether approval under section 269F(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required the Commissioner to be sent a draft order of acquisition and whether the approval granted on the proposal and valuation report was invalid for want of application of mind; (ii) whether there was sufficient material before the competent authority to form a prima facie opinion under section 269C of the Income-tax Act, 1961; and (iii) whether Circular No. 455 dated 16.05.1986 applied to acquisition proceedings pending in appeal before the Tribunal or the High Court.

Issue (i): Whether approval under section 269F(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 required the Commissioner to be sent a draft order of acquisition and whether the approval granted on the proposal and valuation report was invalid for want of application of mind.

Analysis: The approval contemplated by section 269F(6) is to the proposal made by the competent authority after consideration of the material placed before it. The statute does not require the competent authority to forward a draft acquisition order or oblige the Commissioner to record reasons or hear the parties. The Commissioner must apply his mind to the proposal and supporting material, but the approval remains administrative in character and is intended to prevent arbitrary action.

Conclusion: The approval granted by the Commissioner was valid and in accordance with law; the objection to the approval failed.

Issue (ii): Whether there was sufficient material before the competent authority to form a prima facie opinion under section 269C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: Section 269C requires only a preliminary satisfaction on the basis of available material. The valuation report supplied before initiation was treated as sufficient material for forming that prima facie view. The Tribunal's contrary finding on valuation was treated as a finding of fact, not open to interference in second appeal unless shown to be perverse.

Conclusion: Sufficient material existed for the competent authority to form the prima facie opinion required by section 269C; the challenge on this ground failed.

Issue (iii): Whether Circular No. 455 dated 16.05.1986 applied to acquisition proceedings pending in appeal before the Tribunal or the High Court.

Analysis: The circular directed that initiation of proceedings under section 269C should not be made where apparent consideration was Rs. 5 lakhs or less and that proceedings already initiated under section 269D should be dropped in such cases. The word "proceedings" was read broadly to include pending appeals because appellate proceedings are a continuation of the original acquisition proceedings. The circular, being beneficial, was binding on the authorities under section 119.

Conclusion: Circular No. 455 applied to the pending appeal proceedings as well, and the acquisition proceedings were liable to be dropped on that basis.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the Tribunal's decision failed, the acquisition proceedings could not be sustained, and the appeal stood dismissed.

Ratio Decidendi: In proceedings under Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner's approval under section 269F(6) is an administrative approval on the proposal and material placed before him, section 269C requires only a prima facie satisfaction on available material, and a beneficial Board circular directing that pending acquisition proceedings be dropped applies to appellate proceedings as a continuation of the original proceedings.

---