Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether employees who resigned from service before the Pension Regulations came into force were entitled to pension, and whether resignation could be treated as voluntary retirement for the purpose of pension eligibility.
Analysis: The Pension Regulations were framed under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 with the sanction of the Central Government, and Regulation 18 expressly provided that resignation, dismissal, or termination entailed forfeiture of past service and disqualified the employee from pension. The Staff Regulations separately dealt with superannuation, compulsory retirement, and voluntary retirement, and voluntary retirement under Regulation 26 required satisfaction of the prescribed age or qualifying service conditions. Resignation and voluntary retirement were held to be distinct concepts in service law, with different legal consequences. The Court also held that mere administrative recommendations for amendment could not override the unamended Pension Regulations or create an enforceable right.
Conclusion: Resigned employees were not entitled to pension under the Pension Regulations, and resignation could not be equated with voluntary retirement for claiming pension.
Ratio Decidendi: Where service regulations expressly provide forfeiture of past service on resignation, an employee who resigns cannot claim pension by equating resignation with voluntary retirement unless the governing regulations themselves create such an entitlement.