Substance over label in pension law: resignation letter treated as voluntary retirement, preserving pensionary benefits.

A communication styled as a resignation was treated according to its substance, and where an employee with the requisite qualifying service left on account of serious illness while seeking retiral benefits, it was construed as voluntary retirement rather than resignation. As resignation would forfeit past service, but voluntary retirement preserves pension entitlement, the employee's past service could not be forfeited. Beneficial pension regulations were applied liberally, and waiver of pensionary rights was not presumed because no clear, conscious, and unequivocal intention to resign was shown. The widow was therefore entitled to pensionary and retiral benefits.

---

---

Issues: Whether a letter styled as a resignation, but written by an employee who had completed qualifying service and was seeking release on account of serious illness with a request for retiral benefits, should be treated as voluntary retirement so as to preserve pensionary benefits.

Analysis: The employee had completed more than the qualifying service required under the pension regulations and was eligible to seek voluntary retirement. The contents of the letter, read with the surrounding medical correspondence and the later clarification, showed that the employee was leaving because of incapacity caused by illness and was seeking terminal benefits for treatment and livelihood. Mere use of the word "resignation" was not conclusive. Under the pension regulations, resignation entails forfeiture of past service, while voluntary retirement after the requisite notice preserves pension entitlement. Beneficial pension provisions must be construed liberally, and waiver of pensionary rights cannot be presumed unless the intention is clear, conscious, and unequivocal.

Conclusion: The communication was held to be a request for voluntary retirement and not a resignation. The employee's past service could not be forfeited, and the widow became entitled to pensionary and retiral benefits.

Ratio Decidendi: A communication styled as resignation must be treated according to its substance, and where an employee with requisite qualifying service leaves on account of ill health while seeking retiral benefits, the notice may be construed as voluntary retirement if the intention to resign is not clear and unequivocal; beneficial pension regulations must receive a liberal construction in favour of preserving pension rights.

---