TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Grants Stay Without Pre-Deposit for Photography Service Appeal</h1> <h3>SHILPA COLOR LAB Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUT</h3> SHILPA COLOR LAB Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUT - 2006 (4) S.T.R. 565 (Tri. - Bang.) Issues:1. Requirement of pre-deposit of Service Tax.2. Denial of benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. for Photography service.3. Comparison with a previous ruling in the case of Adlabs v. CCE, Bangalore.4. Stay application and appeal listing.Analysis:1. The judgment dealt with the issue of the requirement of pre-deposit of Service Tax amounting to Rs. 11,56,947/- as demanded in the Show Cause Notice dated 30-12-2004 for the periods 16-7-2001 to 30-9-2003 and 1-10-2003 to 31-3-2004. The appellants contested the demand, citing a Board's letter and Notification No. 12/2003-S.T., dated 20-6-2003, arguing that details of input materials used in the photography service need not be disclosed in the invoices.2. The denial of the benefit of Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. for Photography service was a crucial issue in the judgment. The Revenue had contested the benefit based on the lack of details of input materials in the invoices. However, the appellants relied on the Notification and a previous ruling to support their stance. The Tribunal considered the arguments and decided to allow the stay application, granting waiver of pre-deposit of tax and penalty.3. The judgment referenced a previous ruling in the case of Adlabs v. CCE, Bangalore - 2006 (2) S.T.R. 121(Tri.-Bang.), where a similar issue had been addressed, and the appeal had been allowed. The learned Counsel for the appellants highlighted this ruling to support their case for allowing the stay and appeal in the present matter. The Tribunal acknowledged the relevance of the cited judgment in similar cases and decided to grant the stay application unconditionally.4. The issue of the stay application and appeal listing was crucial in the judgment. The Tribunal, after careful consideration and noting the precedent of allowing stay applications in similar matters, decided to grant the stay application unconditionally, waiving the pre-deposit of tax and penalty. The appeal was scheduled to be heard along with similar linked matters on 17th October 2006, ensuring a consistent approach in dealing with such cases.This comprehensive analysis outlines the key issues addressed in the judgment, including the requirement of pre-deposit of Service Tax, denial of benefit under Notification No. 12/2003-S.T., comparison with a previous ruling, and the decision on the stay application and appeal listing.
TaxTMI 