<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 620 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184307</link>
    <description>In a service tax stay application concerning photography services, the Tribunal followed an earlier Bench decision in similar matters and treated the case as fit for the same relief. It held that the appellants were entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit, without insisting on pre-deposit of tax or penalty pending appeal. The stay application was therefore allowed, and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 12:30:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=433835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 620 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184307</link>
      <description>In a service tax stay application concerning photography services, the Tribunal followed an earlier Bench decision in similar matters and treated the case as fit for the same relief. It held that the appellants were entitled to unconditional waiver of pre-deposit, without insisting on pre-deposit of tax or penalty pending appeal. The stay application was therefore allowed, and recovery was stayed during the pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>