Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing service tax liability on photography service, the value of material consumed while rendering the service was deductible when the assessee had maintained records of such inputs but had not shown them separately in the customer bills or invoices.
Analysis: The assessment was tested against the relevant service tax valuation framework and the exemption/clarification contained in Notification No. 12/2003-S.T. and the Board's letter. The decisive point was whether the benefit depended on disclosure of the materials in the invoice. The record showed that the assessee maintained the requisite input records, and neither the notification nor the clarification required the materials used in photography to be separately mentioned in the bills or invoices issued to customers. The denial of deduction solely on that ground was therefore inconsistent with the governing notification and clarification.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to deduction of the value of the materials used in providing photography service, and the denial of the benefit was not sustainable in law.