Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether Form 31 was required for import of machinery brought into the State for the dealer's own use and not for sale; (ii) whether penalty under the Sales Tax Act could be sustained for such non-furnishing of the form.
Issue (i): Whether Form 31 was required for import of machinery brought into the State for the dealer's own use and not for sale.
Analysis: The machinery was found to have been imported for installation and use in manufacturing plastic goods, not for resale. Since the goods were not imported for sale and no taxable sale transaction arose, the statutory check-post form requirement did not apply on the facts found.
Conclusion: Form 31 was not required.
Issue (ii): Whether penalty under the Sales Tax Act could be sustained for such non-furnishing of the form.
Analysis: As the goods were not liable to sales tax in the circumstances and had not been sold, the breach, if any, was only technical. No contumacious conduct or conscious disregard of law was shown, and penalty is not warranted for a mere technical infraction in such circumstances.
Conclusion: The penalty could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded and the penalty order was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are imported for the dealer's own use and not for sale, non-furnishing of the prescribed form is not exigible to penalty unless deliberate or contumacious conduct is established.