1993 (8) TMI 300

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....referred against an order dated 27th November, 1987, passed by the Sales Tax Tribunal, Meerut, whereby it upheld the levy of penalty of Rs. 3,168/- under Section 15-A (1) (o) of the U. P. Sales Tax Act. 2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the revisionist and the learned Standing Counsel. 3. In this case, the revisionist had imported machinery to be installed by it for the manufacture of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enalty. 4. Admittedly, the goods in question were not being imported for sale. They were imported for the dealer's own use and, accordingly, the assessing officer himself held that they were imported for the manufacture of the goods in which the revisionist deals. Therefore, as held by this Court in M/s. Jain Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. v. State of U. P., 1983 UPTC 198, the goods were not liable t....