Article 14 classification upheld for housing board premises exemption under rent control law

Section 3-A of the Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948 validly exempted land and buildings of the Housing Board from the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The classification between tenants of Government, local authority or Board premises and tenants of private landlords was upheld because the Board was a Government-sponsored, non-profit housing body created to address housing shortage, so the two classes were not similarly situated. The exemption bore an intelligible differentia with a rational relation to the object of rent-control legislation. The challenge under Article 14 therefore failed, and the provision was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether section 3-A of the Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948, which exempted land and buildings belonging to or vesting in the Board from the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, violated Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Analysis: The exemption created a classification between tenants of Government, local authority or Board premises and tenants of private landlords. The Court held that the Board was a Government-sponsored body established to meet the housing shortage, without a profit-making motive, and that tenants of such premises were not similarly situated to tenants of private premises. The classification was found to rest on an intelligible differentia having a rational relation to the object of the rent-control legislation. The comparison with cooperative housing societies was rejected because no material showed that they stood in the same position as the Board.

Conclusion: Section 3-A was upheld as constitutionally valid and not violative of Article 14.

---