Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the State Government was competent to direct an appeal against acquittal in cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment or other agencies covered by sub-section (2).
Analysis: Section 378(1) confers a general power on the State Government to appeal from acquittal, but the opening words "save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2)" operate as an exception and exclude the class of cases covered by sub-section (2). The language of the provision, read as a whole, shows that in cases investigated by the Delhi Special Police Establishment or by another agency empowered to investigate under any Central Act other than the Code, the Central Government alone is the competent authority to direct an appeal. The word "also" in sub-section (2) cannot be used to defeat the express exception in sub-section (1), and the earlier construction placed on the repealed provision in Section 417 of the 1898 Code cannot override the materially different language of Section 378.
Conclusion: The State Government was not competent to file the appeal; the authority to direct appeal in the covered class of cases vested in the Central Government.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later statute expressly qualifies a general appellate power by an exception clause, the exception must be given full effect, and the class of cases carved out by that clause is excluded from the general power notwithstanding any residual or inconsistent wording elsewhere in the provision.