Revenue's Appeal Partially Allowed: Foreign Exchange Loss Dismissed, Book Profit Addition Upheld

The Revenue's appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's grounds regarding the foreign exchange loss and interest disallowance but upheld the addition to book profit under section 115JB, emphasizing the necessity of compliance with the Companies Act in preparing accounts.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Treatment of loss incurred on cancellation of foreign exchange forward contract.
2. Deletion of disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 82,49,728.
3. Deletion of addition of Rs. 10,38,13,765 being the surplus from the sale of rights in the premises to the book profit u/s. 115JB.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Treatment of Loss Incurred on Cancellation of Foreign Exchange Forward Contract:
The Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s decision to treat the loss on cancellation of foreign exchange forward contracts as a business loss rather than a speculation loss. The Assessing Officer had added the loss of Rs. 25,75,000 to the total income of the assessee as speculation loss. However, the CIT(A) relied on the jurisdictional High Court decision in ITO vs. Badradas Gauridu Pvt. Ltd. and guidelines issued by RBI under FEMA, 1999, to classify the transaction as a business loss. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as the learned DR conceded that the issue was settled in favor of the assessee by the Supreme Court in CIT vs. Woodword Governor (I) Pvt. Ltd.

2. Deletion of Disallowance of Interest Amounting to Rs. 82,49,728:
The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest expenditure of Rs. 82,49,728 on borrowed funds, arguing that the funds were used for investment purposes, not business purposes, thus not fulfilling the conditions of section 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The CIT(A) found that the assessee had not made any new investments during the year and had used the borrowed funds to pay sundry creditors, thereby allowing the interest claim. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the Revenue could not provide evidence to counter the factual findings that no fresh investments were made, and the disallowance was based on mere presumption.

3. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 10,38,13,765 to Book Profit u/s. 115JB:
The Assessing Officer added Rs. 10,38,13,765 to the book profit u/s. 115JB, arguing that the profit from the sale of rights in the premises was not routed through the Profit and Loss A/c but directly taken to the Balance Sheet as capital reserve, violating the provisions of Part II and Part III of Schedule VI to the Companies Act. The CIT(A) sided with the assessee, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Apollo Tyres Ltd. and the Bombay High Court's decision in Kinetic Motor Co. Ltd., stating that the Assessing Officer cannot go beyond the net profit shown in the Profit and Loss A/c. The Tribunal, however, found that the accounts were not prepared in accordance with the Companies Act as the profit was not routed through the Profit and Loss A/c. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the Assessing Officer's decision to rework the book profit.

Conclusion:
The appeal by the Revenue was partly allowed. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's grounds regarding the foreign exchange loss and interest disallowance but upheld the addition to book profit under section 115JB, emphasizing the necessity of compliance with the Companies Act in preparing accounts.

---