Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        VAT and Sales Tax

        1955 (9) TMI 61 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Municipal toll tax must stay within statutory limits; writ relief remains available despite an alternative remedy in public interest challenges. An alternative remedy by suit does not automatically bar writ relief under Article 226 where the challenge raises a public question, and nondisclosure of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Municipal toll tax must stay within statutory limits; writ relief remains available despite an alternative remedy in public interest challenges.

                          An alternative remedy by suit does not automatically bar writ relief under Article 226 where the challenge raises a public question, and nondisclosure of a pending suit is not material unless it goes to the root of the claim. A municipal toll may be levied only within the statutory territorial scope authorised by the governing enactment, and Section 128(1)(vii) was read as permitting toll on vehicles entering the municipality for use of municipal roads, not on vehicles leaving its limits. The levy was therefore invalid to that extent. The Article 14 challenge failed because the impost was treated as a tax on vehicles using municipal roads, not as a passenger tax.




                          Issues: (i) Whether the writ petitions were not maintainable because an alternative remedy by way of suit was available or had already been pursued, and whether alleged suppression of material facts barred relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India; (ii) Whether the Municipal Board could lawfully levy toll tax on motor vehicles leaving the limits of the Hardwar Union Municipality, and whether the impugned levy was invalid under the statutory provisions and Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

                          Issue (i): Whether the writ petitions were not maintainable because an alternative remedy by way of suit was available or had already been pursued, and whether alleged suppression of material facts barred relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

                          Analysis: The availability of an alternative remedy was held not to be an absolute bar to the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The existence of a suit for injunction did not by itself make the writ petitions inadmissible, particularly where the levy challenged affected a general class of persons and raised a public question. The omission to mention the pending suit was not treated as suppression of a material fact, because it did not go to the root of the relief claimed. Likewise, the reference to railway passengers paying pilgrim tax was not regarded as material suppression affecting maintainability.

                          Conclusion: The preliminary objections failed, and the writ petitions were maintainable.

                          Issue (ii): Whether the Municipal Board could lawfully levy toll tax on motor vehicles leaving the limits of the Hardwar Union Municipality, and whether the impugned levy was invalid under the statutory provisions and Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

                          Analysis: The statutory power under Section 128(1)(vii) of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916 was construed as authorising toll on vehicles entering the municipality for use of municipal roads, not on vehicles leaving its limits. The earlier notification was also examined against the enabling power under Section 128(1)(xiv) of the United Provinces Municipalities Act, 1916 and the corresponding provincial legislative competence under the Government of India Act, 1935. On the constitutional challenge, the levy was not treated as a tax on passengers but as a tax on vehicles using municipal roads, and therefore the fact that railway passengers were not similarly taxed did not establish hostile discrimination under Article 14.

                          Conclusion: The levy was invalid only to the extent that it purported to charge toll tax on vehicles leaving the municipal limits, but the challenge based on Article 14 failed.

                          Final Conclusion: The petitions succeeded only in part: the objections to maintainability were rejected, the constitutional challenge was negatived, and relief was granted against collection of toll tax on vehicles when leaving the municipal limits.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A municipal toll under the governing statute may be levied only within the statutory territorial scope authorised by the enactment, and the existence of an alternative remedy does not bar writ relief where the challenge raises a public question and the alleged nondisclosure is not material to the claim.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found