https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175436 Municipal toll authority under the governing statute extends to vehicles entering the municipality for use of municipal roads, not vehicles leaving its limits. Collection of toll on departing vehicles was therefore invalid, while differential treatment of railway passengers did not amount to hostile discrimination because the levy taxed vehicles using municipal roads rather than passengers. Availability or pursuit of an injunction suit did not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge affected a general class and raised a public question. Failure to disclose the suit or pilgrim tax paid by railway passengers was not material suppression. Relief lay only against toll collection on vehicles leaving municipal limits. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:31:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175436 Municipal toll authority under the governing statute extends to vehicles entering the municipality for use of municipal roads, not vehicles leaving its limits. Collection of toll on departing vehicles was therefore invalid, while differential treatment of railway passengers did not amount to hostile discrimination because the levy taxed vehicles using municipal roads rather than passengers. Availability or pursuit of an injunction suit did not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge affected a general class and raised a public question. Failure to disclose the suit or pilgrim tax paid by railway passengers was not material suppression. Relief lay only against toll collection on vehicles leaving municipal limits. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 26 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175436