Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2000 (9) TMI 1048 - AT - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Zinc Residue Confiscation, Releases Containers The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of Zinc Residue under Section 111(f) but set aside the confiscation of containers, ordering their release to M/s. CMB ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Upholds Zinc Residue Confiscation, Releases Containers

                            The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of Zinc Residue under Section 111(f) but set aside the confiscation of containers, ordering their release to M/s. CMB Transport Agency. The confiscation of vessel CMB Medal was set aside due to legal infirmities in the show-cause notice. Penalties on the Captain, Chief Officer, and individual officers of CMB Transport were not sustained, except for the agency, whose penalty was reduced from Rs. 25 lakhs to Rs. 2.50 lakhs. Consequential relief was ordered accordingly.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Liability to confiscation of the 4 containers and their cargo under Section 111(f), (g), and (h) of the Customs Act.
                            2. Confiscation of the vessel CMB Medal under Section 115(2) of the Customs Act.
                            3. Imposition of penalties on the individuals and the agency involved.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Liability to Confiscation of the 4 Containers and Their Cargo:
                            The Tribunal first examined the liability to confiscation under Section 111(f), (g), and (h) of the Customs Act. It was found that Section 111(h) did not apply as the unloading was done at an approved place under the general supervision of Customs, and there was no evidence of contravention. Section 111(g) was also not applicable as the containers were included in the Port Trust's records as per Section 45(2) of the Act. However, Section 111(f) was applicable since the containers were not mentioned in the import manifest, attracting confiscation. The Tribunal noted that the containers were included in the advance list filed with the Port Trust and Customs, indicating no intent to conceal their existence. The contents of the containers (zinc residue and zinc turnings) were freely importable and not contraband. The consignee, Mr. Navneet Cheddha, was a real person who had placed an order for the goods. The Tribunal concluded that the non-mention in the manifest was a technical error and not a premeditated act of smuggling.

                            2. Confiscation of the Vessel CMB Medal:
                            The Tribunal examined the confiscation of the vessel under Section 115(2) of the Customs Act. It was held that the non-declaration of the containers in the manifest was a technical error. However, the show-cause notice was found to be legally infirm as it did not name the owner of the vessel, Conti-Schepers-gessellschaft mb H & Co., as a noticee. This grave legal infirmity rendered the confiscation orders invalid, and they were set aside.

                            3. Imposition of Penalties:
                            The Tribunal reviewed the penalties imposed on various individuals and the agency. It was found that the Captain and Chief Officer of the ship did not have conscious knowledge that their actions would render the goods liable to confiscation. Their statements did not admit any knowledge of wrongdoing. Consequently, the penalties imposed on them were not sustained. Similarly, the individual officers of the shipping agents, M/s. CMB Transport, were not found personally responsible for rendering the cargo liable to confiscation, and the penalties on them were also not sustained. However, the agency, M/s. CMB Transport, was held responsible for understanding the Customs Act requirements and educating their officers. Therefore, the penalty on the agency was upheld but reduced from Rs. 25 lakhs to Rs. 2.50 lakhs.

                            Summary of Findings:
                            (i) The orders of absolute confiscation of the Zinc Residue etc. under Section 111(f) are upheld.
                            (ii) The orders of absolute confiscation of the containers are set aside, and they are ordered to be released to M/s. CMB Transport Agency.
                            (iii) The orders of confiscation of the Vessel CMB Medal are set aside.
                            (iv) The penalty imposed on CMB Transport is reduced from Rs. 25 lakhs to Rs. 2.50 lakhs.
                            (v) The penalties imposed on the following individuals are remitted in full:
                            1. Mr. Lehman Hans Arnold - Captain of the Ship M.V. CMB Medal.
                            2. Mr. Kleesse Hans Arno - Chief Officer of the said vessel.
                            3. Captain Ashok Dhawan - Regional General Manager, CMB Transport.
                            4. Mr. K. Chakravarthy - Regional Manager.
                            5. Mr. Ashok Patel - Manager.
                            6. Mr. Amit Dalal - Asst. Manager (working in Import Dept.).
                            7. Mr. P.P. Mohan Kutty - Asstt. Manager.
                            (vi) Appropriate consequential relief is ordered.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found