Suspension order quashed, but charge-sheet upheld: disciplinary charges cannot be struck down before evidence is tested.

The suspension order was upheld as liable to be quashed on the facts surrounding initiation of disciplinary action, with no basis found to disturb the High Court's interference. The charge-sheet, however, could not be annulled at the threshold by examining the merits of the allegations before evidence was led in the disciplinary enquiry. Because the charges were supported by documents to be proved in the proceedings, they could not be treated as baseless at that stage. The result was that the suspension order remained invalidated, while the disciplinary proceedings on the charge-sheet were allowed to continue.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the order placing the respondent under suspension was liable to be quashed; (ii) Whether the charge-sheet issued in the disciplinary proceedings could be set aside at the threshold.

Issue (i): Whether the order placing the respondent under suspension was liable to be quashed.

Analysis: The challenge to the suspension order was examined on the facts leading to the initiation of disciplinary action, and no ground was found to disturb the High Court's interference with that order.

Conclusion: The quashing of the suspension order was upheld.

Issue (ii): Whether the charge-sheet issued in the disciplinary proceedings could be set aside at the threshold.

Analysis: A charge-sheet cannot be annulled by entering into the merits of the allegations before evidence is led in the disciplinary enquiry. The allegations were supported by documents which were to be proved in the proceedings, and it could not then be said that the charges were without basis.

Conclusion: The quashing of the charge-sheet was set aside and the disciplinary proceedings were permitted to continue.

Final Conclusion: The decision maintained the invalidation of the suspension order but restored the employer's right to pursue disciplinary action on the charge-sheet.

---