TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a memorandum initiating minor penalty proceedings could be quashed at the stage of issuance on the ground of alleged bias, delay, and the respondent's claim of having acted as a whistle-blower.
Analysis: The memorandum was only the initiation of disciplinary action under Rule 16 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. The allegations had to be examined by the disciplinary authority, and the respondent still had the opportunity to submit a reply, contest the imputations, and urge that the complaint made by him was bona fide. The challenge was against a charge memorandum and not a final punitive order. In such matters, judicial review is limited, and the Court will not assess the truth or sufficiency of the charges at the stage of framing of charges unless the action is wholly without jurisdiction or patently illegal.
Conclusion: The memorandum could not be quashed at that stage, and the disciplinary proceedings were permitted to continue.
Ratio Decidendi: A charge-sheet or memorandum initiating disciplinary proceedings is ordinarily not liable to be interfered with in writ jurisdiction at the threshold, because the truth of the allegations must be determined by the disciplinary authority and not by the Court.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
