<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 391 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174137</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision to quash the charge-sheet in disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that the High Court should not have delved into the merits of the allegations prematurely, allowing the disciplinary process to proceed based on the charge-sheet.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=399415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 391 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174137</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision to quash the charge-sheet in disciplinary proceedings. The Court held that the High Court should not have delved into the merits of the allegations prematurely, allowing the disciplinary process to proceed based on the charge-sheet.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>