Bona fide landlord requirement under rent control depends on legal right to alternative accommodation and the landlord's own residential needs.

Under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that bona fide personal requirement must be assessed on an objective appraisal of the evidence, and the landlord remains the best judge of his residential needs. Alternative accommodation is relevant only if it is physically available and legally occupiable by the landlord; mere presence elsewhere as a guest does not defeat the claim. The Court also held that the High Court should not interfere with the Rent Controller's finding by reappreciating evidence absent a valid basis to disturb legality or propriety. The eviction order in favour of the landlord was restored.

---

---

Issues: Whether the landlord had established bona fide personal requirement of the demised premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the Rent Controller's order under Section 25-B(8) of the Act on the ground of availability of alternative accommodation.

Analysis: The landlord's claim was found to be bona fide on an objective appraisal of the evidence. The Court held that the tenant's contention that the landlord was staying elsewhere as a guest did not negate the statutory requirement, since the relevant inquiry is not merely physical availability of some other premises but also whether the landlord has a legal right to occupy that accommodation. The Court reiterated that the landlord is the best judge of his residential requirement and that courts should not prescribe a residential standard of their own. It further held that the High Court erred in interfering with the Rent Controller's finding merely on reappreciation of evidence, since there was no valid ground to dislodge the conclusion on legality and propriety.

Conclusion: The landlord's bona fide requirement was established, and the High Court's interference was unjustified.

Final Conclusion: The eviction order in favour of the landlord was restored, and the challenge to the Rent Controller's determination failed.

Ratio Decidendi: In deciding bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, alternative accommodation must be assessed not only for physical availability but also for the landlord's legal right to occupy it, and the landlord remains the best judge of his residential needs.

---