https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171770 Under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that bona fide personal requirement must be assessed on an objective appraisal of the evidence, and the landlord remains the best judge of his residential needs. Alternative accommodation is relevant only if it is physically available and legally occupiable by the landlord; mere presence elsewhere as a guest does not defeat the claim. The Court also held that the High Court should not interfere with the Rent Controller's finding by reappreciating evidence absent a valid basis to disturb legality or propriety. The eviction order in favour of the landlord was restored. en-us Tue, 12 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:12:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171770 Under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that bona fide personal requirement must be assessed on an objective appraisal of the evidence, and the landlord remains the best judge of his residential needs. Alternative accommodation is relevant only if it is physically available and legally occupiable by the landlord; mere presence elsewhere as a guest does not defeat the claim. The Court also held that the High Court should not interfere with the Rent Controller's finding by reappreciating evidence absent a valid basis to disturb legality or propriety. The eviction order in favour of the landlord was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171770