Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether conversion of coal breeze into hard coke amounts to manufacture under section 2(e1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, and consequently whether the turnover of hard coke is liable to tax in the hands of the dealer as manufacturer.
Analysis: The definition of manufacture under section 2(e1) is wide and includes processing, treating or adapting goods. The process in question involved burning coal breeze at a specific temperature to remove impurities and produce hard coke. The resulting product was commercially known as a distinct and highly combustible commodity with a different use and character. Applying the settled principle that manufacture may exist where processing brings about a commercial transformation, the conversion of coal into hard coke could not be treated as the mere sale of the same commodity. The earlier view that coal and hard coke are the same for rate purposes did not determine whether the activity itself amounted to manufacture.
Conclusion: The conversion of coal into hard coke amounts to manufacture under section 2(e1) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, and the dealer is liable to tax on the sale of hard coke as a manufacturer.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, a process that transforms coal into a commercially distinct product such as hard coke constitutes manufacture because the statutory definition extends to processing, treating or adapting goods.