Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cutting and sizing iron and steel scrap into smaller usable pieces amounted to "manufacture" within section 2(j) of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1959 so as to entitle the appellants to the exemption.
Analysis: The statutory definition of "manufacture" was framed in expansive terms, including producing, collecting, extracting, preparing, or making goods. The text of the definition itself showed that the legislature did not intend the term to be confined to the production of a new article, because it expressly extended to activities such as collecting goods and lopping or cutting trees, which do not create a new product. In that setting, decisions under other enactments with narrower or different definitions were not determinative. The appellants' activity of mechanically cutting bulky scrap into pieces suitable for rolling mills and foundries was a process that prepared and made the goods saleable and therefore fell within the wide statutory meaning.
Conclusion: The activity constituted "manufacture" under section 2(j), and the appellants were entitled to the exemption.
Final Conclusion: The High Court's view was reversed, and the appellants' eligibility to the exemption was restored.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute defines "manufacture" in expansive terms that include preparing, collecting, or making goods, the term is not confined to the emergence of a new article, and a process that makes goods saleable may amount to manufacture.