Blending coconut oil with perfumes can qualify as manufacture when the finished product becomes commercially distinct.

Blending refined, bleached and deodorised coconut oil with perfumes, followed by filtration and packing, was treated as manufacture because the statutory definition included blending and no exclusion applied. The resulting product was commercially distinct in trade parlance from the raw material, making it a new commercial commodity for sales tax purposes. On that basis, the dealer also satisfied the conditions for a provisional certificate under the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995, as the manufacturing intention requirement was met. Relief was therefore linked to issuance of the provisional certificate for the limited period before commencement of manufacturing and registration.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether blending refined coconut oil with perfumes and subsequent filtration amounts to manufacture under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994. (ii) Whether the applicant was entitled to a provisional certificate under the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995.

Issue (i): Whether blending refined coconut oil with perfumes and subsequent filtration amounts to manufacture under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994.

Analysis: The statutory definition of manufacture included producing, making, extracting or blending goods, and no exclusionary prescription had been made for the process in question. The admitted process involved blending perfumes with refined, bleached and deodorized coconut oil and filtering the mixture before packing it for sale. The resulting product was also treated in trade parlance as distinct from the raw material, supporting the conclusion that the end product was a manufactured commodity.

Conclusion: The activity amounted to manufacture and the finished product was a new commercial commodity.

Issue (ii): Whether the applicant was entitled to a provisional certificate under the West Bengal Sales Tax Rules, 1995.

Analysis: Under rule 26 and rule 27, a provisional certificate could be granted to a dealer who intended to establish a manufacturing business in West Bengal and satisfied the issuing authority of such bona fide intention. Since the activity was held to be manufacture, the basis for rejecting the application disappeared, and the applicant was entitled to the certificate for the relevant period up to commencement of manufacturing and registration.

Conclusion: The applicant was entitled to a provisional certificate up to 16 January 1998.

Final Conclusion: The impugned orders were unsustainable and relief was granted to the applicant by directing issuance of the provisional certificate for the limited period recognized under the rules.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory definition of manufacture expressly includes blending, and the resulting product is commercially distinct in trade parlance, the activity constitutes manufacture for tax purposes.

---