Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the revised assessment orders were liable to be set aside when the appellate authority had already decided the matter in the assessee's favour and the assessee had sought an opportunity to place those orders before the assessing officer.
Analysis: The revised assessments were made under section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 read with section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The appellate orders in the assessee's own case were passed before the impugned orders, but were not served on the assessee by the time objections were required to be filed. In a quasi-judicial hierarchy, the assessing authority was bound to take note of the appellate determination. The request for adjournment ought to have been granted so that the appellate orders could be produced and considered before finalising the revision.
Conclusion: The revised assessment orders were unsustainable and were set aside, with direction to the assessee to appear before the assessing officer and place the appellate orders and any objection to the revised proposal, and for the authority to consider the same and proceed further.