TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules in favor of cotton yarn manufacturer in tax rate dispute, upholding Form C benefit</h1> The Court held in favor of the applicant, a cotton yarn manufacturer, in a case involving the redetermination of tax rates on Central sales and the ... - Issues involved: The judgment involves the following issues: 1. Justification of redetermining/rectifying the rate of tax on Central sales of cotton yarn u/s 22 of the Act. 2. Justification of not accepting/granting benefit of form C and denying concessional rate of tax on sale of cotton yarn covered by C form. 3. Justification of upholding the order passed by the assessing authority u/s 22 of the Act. 4. Justification of confirming levy of interest when disputing the rate of tax and filing C forms.Issue 1 - Redetermination of Tax Rate: The Tribunal's decision to redetermine the rate of tax on Central sales of cotton yarn u/s 22 of the Act was challenged. The applicant, engaged in manufacturing cotton yarn, argued that the Tribunal's action was debatable and involved a change of mind. The Court held that unnecessary taxation should be avoided, and taxation should be in accordance with the law.Issue 2 - Rejection of Form C Benefit: The main contention was the rejection of the applicant's application u/s 12B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, leading to the rejection of form C submitted for concessional tax rate. The Court found that the applicant's submission of form C after the assessing officer sought to enhance the tax rate was justified. The rejection of the application was set aside, and the matter was remanded for appropriate orders.Issue 3 - Upholding Assessing Authority's Order: The Tribunal's decision to uphold the order passed by the assessing authority u/s 22 of the Act was challenged. The Court emphasized that the law does not permit unnecessary taxation and that tax should only be levied in accordance with the law. The appeal was allowed, and the rejection of the application u/s 12B was set aside.Issue 4 - Confirmation of Interest Levy: The Tribunal's confirmation of the levy of interest despite the applicant's bona fide dispute over the tax rate and submission of C forms was questioned. The Court considered the applicant's diligence in obtaining the forms and the timing of their submission. The dismissal of the appeal on this ground was set aside, and the matter was remanded for appropriate orders.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
