Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (5) TMI 577

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....learned Standing Counsel appearing for the department. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1998-99 (Central). The questions of law sought to be raised in the revisions are as follows: 1.. Whether the Tribunal was justified in redetermining/rectifying the rate of tax on Central sales of cotton yarn under section 22 of the Act, which is debatable question and involved change of mind? ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....egistered under the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Sri Shubham Agarwal, the learned counsel for the applicant, has at the outset stated that he will press only question No. 2 relating to rejection of his application under section 12B of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, whereby 12 form C submitted by it at the first appellate stage were not accepted. The result of reject....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....form C had been submitted. Therefore, the applicant had not been seriously concerned with the filing of the said form C. Subsequently in proceeding under section 22 of the Act, the rate of tax was sought to be enhanced by the assessing officer from two per cent to four per cent and therefore, the applicant became more active and diligent in getting those forms from the purchasers. However, a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he learned Standing Counsel has submitted that from the perusal of the application under section 12B of the Act, the ingredients had not been made out and therefore the application was rightly rejected. The learned counsel for the applicant has sought to rely upon certain decisions in support of his contention that the dealer should not be denied opportunity and secondly, that if the tax liabil....