Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether declaration forms E-1 and C, produced at the appellate/revisional stage along with an application for additional evidence, could be accepted and considered for granting the concessional treatment claimed by the assessee.
Analysis: The transaction was admitted to be an inter-State transaction, and rejection of the forms would result in taxation at a higher rate. The Court followed the earlier view that where the forms were not available at the time of assessment for unavoidable reasons, but were produced before the appellate forum, the authority should adopt a liberal approach and consider them so that tax is levied only in accordance with law. The Tribunal ought not to have ignored the additional-evidence request and could have examined the effect of the forms subject to verification.
Conclusion: The forms were required to be accepted for consideration, and the matter was remitted to the Tribunal to take them into account and decide the issue afresh in accordance with law.