Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment completed on 10 May 1991 for the quarter ending 31 March 1987 was barred by limitation in view of the amendment to section 11(2a) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.
Analysis: The assessment was governed by section 11(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and the relevant limitation provision in section 11(2a). Before the original four-year period expired, section 11(2a) was amended with effect from 1 June 1987 so as to extend the permissible time for completion of assessments falling within the stated category. As limitation is a matter of procedural law, the amended provision applied to the pending assessment proceeding. Since the assessment was completed before the amended outer limit expired, it could not be treated as time-barred.
Conclusion: The assessment was not barred by limitation and the contrary view of the Board was erroneous.