Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the additional assessment was barred by limitation under Rule 17(1) of the Madras General Sales Tax Rules, 1939, and whether Section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 applied to an assessment not yet final when the new Act came into force.
Analysis: Rule 17(1) prescribed a period of three years from the end of the assessment year for escaped turnover to be brought to tax. Section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 enlarged that period to four years. The material question was not whether the new provision operated retrospectively in the abstract, but whether the earlier period of limitation had already expired before the new Act commenced. Finality of assessment did not attach on the mere making of the original assessment; it attached only after the period for appeal, revision, or additional assessment had expired. As that period had not expired when the new Act came into force, the amended statutory regime governed the pending liability. The plea based on accrued or vested rights and the saving provision in Section 41 failed for the same reason.
Conclusion: The additional assessment was valid and within time under Section 14(4) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957, and the revision was liable to be dismissed.