Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the retreading contract, which required the tyres to be moved from Karnataka to Andhra Pradesh after retreading, constituted an inter-State works contract outside the taxing power of the State under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The contract contemplated not merely the affixation of rubber in Karnataka but also the return of the retreaded tyres to Andhra Pradesh, and the movement of goods was an integral incident of the bargain. Explanation 3(c) to the definition of "sale" could fix the situs of a deemed sale in the State only where the works contract did not involve movement of goods from one State to another. Read with the exclusionary language in explanation 3(a) and the principles settled under section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and article 366(29-A)(b) of the Constitution of India, a State cannot convert an inter-State transaction into a local sale by legal fiction. The earlier authorities on works contracts and inter-State movement of goods supported the conclusion that the taxing authority had no jurisdiction to treat the transaction as an intra-State sale.
Conclusion: The contract was an inter-State works contract and was not taxable under the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a works contract itself requires movement of goods from one State to another, the deemed sale remains an inter-State sale and cannot be subjected to State sales tax by merely fixing a local situs.