<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 943 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160106</link>
    <description>A retreading contract requiring tyres to be taken from Karnataka to Andhra Pradesh after retreading was treated as an inter-State works contract because the movement of goods formed an integral part of the bargain. Explanation 3(c) to the definition of &quot;sale&quot; could fix the situs of a deemed sale only where the works contract did not involve inter-State movement; it could not, by legal fiction, convert an inter-State transaction into a local sale. Read with section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and article 366(29-A)(b) of the Constitution, the transaction was outside the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 and not taxable as an intra-State sale.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 17:40:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=338663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 943 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160106</link>
      <description>A retreading contract requiring tyres to be taken from Karnataka to Andhra Pradesh after retreading was treated as an inter-State works contract because the movement of goods formed an integral part of the bargain. Explanation 3(c) to the definition of &quot;sale&quot; could fix the situs of a deemed sale only where the works contract did not involve inter-State movement; it could not, by legal fiction, convert an inter-State transaction into a local sale. Read with section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and article 366(29-A)(b) of the Constitution, the transaction was outside the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 and not taxable as an intra-State sale.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=160106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>