Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether collection of sales tax and surcharge on second sales of goods not liable to tax attracted penalty under section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether subsequent issue of credit notes could negate or reduce the penalty.
Analysis: The assessee had collected sales tax and surcharge on second sales when no tax was payable. The collection was not made under any dispute as to taxability, nor was it a case of tax collected and remitted to the Government, nor a case of refund at the end of the year in the nature of rebate or cash discount. The Tribunal found that the amounts were retained by the assessee, and the later passing of credit notes did not establish actual refund to the purchasers. On these facts, the collection was held to be a deliberate and wilful violation of section 22(1), attracting the penal consequence under section 22(2).
Conclusion: Penalty under section 22(2) was rightly attracted, and the reduced penalty ordered by the Appellate Tribunal called for no interference. The revision was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a dealer collects tax on transactions not liable to tax and merely issues credit notes without proof of actual refund, the collection remains a contravention attracting penalty under the sales tax law.