Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 could be sustained merely because the assessee did not refund the sales tax and surcharge collected on rebate and cash discount, when the collection itself had been held to be lawful.
Analysis: Section 22(2) is attracted only where a person or registered dealer collects an amount by way of tax in contravention of section 22(1). The Tribunal had already found that the assessee's collection of tax and surcharge on rebate and cash discount was not in breach of the Act. Once the collection itself was not unlawful, failure to pass on or refund the collected amount could not, by itself, create liability to penalty under section 22(2). The provision does not operate merely because the assessee may have retained the amount or not refunded it to customers.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 22(2) could not be directed on the footing that the assessee had not refunded the amount collected on rebate and cash discount; the direction to levy penalty was unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The revision succeeded, and the assessee obtained relief from the penalty direction.
Ratio Decidendi: Penalty under section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 is exigible only when tax is collected in contravention of section 22(1), and not merely because the collected amount was not refunded to customers.