Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty could be levied for collection of sales tax at 4 per cent multi-point on the sale of petroleum jelly when the collection was made under a bona fide belief shared by both the dealer and the department as to the applicable rate and point of tax.
Analysis: The assessee had collected tax at 4 per cent multi-point in accordance with the assessment then prevailing and the department's own understanding. The later view that the sales were liable to be taxed at 8 per cent single point showed that the collection had been made under a mutual mistake regarding taxability and rate. In such circumstances, the collection could not be treated as a violation warranting penalty under section 22(1), and the consequential penalty under section 22(2) was unsustainable.
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable, and the revision by the Revenue failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where tax is collected under a bona fide and mutually shared mistake as to the applicable rate or point of levy, the collection does not constitute a penal violation attracting penalty provisions.