Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the levy of penalty under section 22(2) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 was sustainable on the facts found.
Analysis: The assessee had collected tax at 8% on the commodity throughout the year and had remitted it to the department. The immediate preceding assessment had also accepted the same rate and had attained finality. The Commissioner's clarification fixing a lower rate was issued only shortly before the assessment order and after the assessee had acted on the common understanding of the applicable rate. In these circumstances, the collection of tax at the higher rate was treated as having occurred under a mutual mistake, and the facts did not justify penal consequences under section 22(2).
Conclusion: The levy of penalty under section 22(2) was not sustainable and was rightly cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi: Where both the assessee and the assessing authority proceed under a mutual mistake as to the applicable rate of tax, and the collection is consistent with the accepted position in the immediately preceding assessment, penalty for wrongful collection is not attracted.