Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the commercial tax authority could refuse to issue C forms on the ground of apprehension of misuse, and whether the petitioner was entitled to have the request for C forms considered and decided in accordance with law.
Analysis: The settled position applied was that issuance of C forms depends on whether the applicant is a registered dealer, has paid the prescribed charges, and has produced the necessary challans. At the stage of issuing C forms, the authority is not entitled to embark upon an enquiry into the proposed use of the forms or to refuse them merely because misuse is apprehended. Any misuse can be dealt with later under the statutory penal provisions, but that does not justify denial at the threshold. The petitioner's request was therefore required to be dealt with in the light of the earlier decisions recognising this limited administrative function.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to consideration of the request for C forms in accordance with law, and refusal based on apprehended misuse was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: C forms cannot be withheld at the issuance stage on speculative apprehension of misuse when the statutory conditions for issue are satisfied; any misuse is to be addressed under the penal machinery of the Act.