Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to obtain C forms at the stage of issuance without an enquiry into whether the underlying transactions were local sales or inter-State sales and whether the forms might later be misused.
Analysis: The entitlement to C forms was held to depend on limited conditions at the threshold stage. The claimant had to be a registered dealer, the goods had to fall within the registration certificate, and the prescribed charges had to be paid with proof of payment. The authority issuing the forms was not required, at that stage, to decide the nature of the underlying transaction or to conduct a premature enquiry into possible misuse. Any objection regarding the true character of the transaction or misuse of the forms could be examined later at the assessment or penal stage under the Act.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to the supply of C forms on compliance with the prescribed conditions, and the rejection of the request was unjustified.
Ratio Decidendi: At the stage of issuing C forms, the authority may verify only the statutory conditions for issuance and cannot refuse the forms on a pre-emptive enquiry into the nature of the transaction or possible future misuse; such questions arise only at the assessment or penalty stage.