Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the supply of cement, iron and steel by the undertaking to its contractors for use in construction of factory and other buildings constituted a sale liable to tax under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, and whether the undertaking could be treated as a dealer carrying on business in such goods.
Analysis: The agreement showed that the materials were to be issued by the owner only for incorporation in the works, that the contractor had to account for their receipt and consumption, return surplus materials, and hold them in custody as trustee while title remained with the owner. The definition of sale under section 2(h) required a transfer of property in goods for consideration, but the contractual terms and surrounding circumstances negatived any absolute transfer of ownership. Mere debit and credit entries in the accounts did not convert the supply into a sale. The clauses relating to unused cement bags and cut pieces of steel also did not indicate a transfer of ownership, since those items were treated as useless or abandoned materials and did not alter the basic legal character of the transaction.
Conclusion: The supply of cement, iron and steel to the contractors was not a sale within section 2(h) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, the undertaking was not liable to tax on that supply, and the revisions were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where materials are supplied to a contractor under a works contract only for incorporation in the work, with title retained by the owner and the contractor bound to account for and return surplus materials, the transaction is not a sale and no sales tax liability arises.