Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether supply of iron, steel and cement by the petitioner-corporation to its contractors under the contract terms amounted to a sale liable to sales tax under the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The contract clause governing supply of materials showed that the corporation agreed to supply specified materials for use in the work at fixed rates, the value of such materials was to be adjusted by deduction from the contractor's bills, and unused materials were to be returned or accounted for. The Court compared this clause with the clauses considered in earlier decisions and held that the substance of the arrangement was the same. On the settled principle that the whole contract must be read as a whole and that a supply of goods for consideration with transfer of property in the goods constitutes a sale, the petitioner's attempt to distinguish the arrangement was rejected.
Conclusion: The supply of materials to the contractors amounted to a sale and was liable to sales tax; the challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petitions were not sustainable and were dismissed, leaving the tax demand and connected action undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a contract for execution of works provides for supply of specified materials by the owner at fixed rates with adjustment of their value against the contractor's dues, the transaction amounts to a taxable sale if the substance of the arrangement shows transfer of property in the goods for consideration.