TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Constitutional validity of ULCRA provisions upheld; untimely challenge dismissed; excess land vested under Section 10(3) after Section 10(1) notice</h1> SC upheld the constitutional validity of the impugned ULCRA provisions and dismissed the challenge to the competent authority's order as untimely and ... Constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act questioned on the ground that they are violative of Article 31-A(1) of the Constitution - Held that:- The challenge to the order passed by the competent authority 1s also without substance. No appeal or revision application was filed against it and therefore it had become final and binding on the appellants. After the determination of the excess land, a notification under Section 10(1) of the Act was issued and the excess land vested in the State Government under Section 10(3) of the Act. Ten years thereafter, the appellants had filed the Writ Petition challenging the said order. The High Court was, therefore, justified in dismissing the Writ Petition summarily. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal challenging the order of the Deputy Collector regarding excess land under the Urban Land Ceiling Act. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Act and noted that the challenge was without merit. The High Court's dismissal of the Writ Petition was justified as no appeal was filed against the order within the specified time frame.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
