Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of scrapped vehicles, old tyres, tubes, tender forms and other unserviceable material by the corporation constituted "business" so as to make it a "dealer" liable to sales tax.
Analysis: The corporation was constituted to provide an efficient and economical road transport service and its main activity was not trade in scrap or unserviceable goods. The Court followed the earlier decision directly concerning the same corporation, which had held that disposal of scrap arising in the course of its statutory transport functions was not a business activity. The reliance placed on the railway scrap cases was distinguished because, on the facts, those decisions involved materially different statutory objects and commercial setting. The Court held that the department had not shown any volume, frequency, continuity or regularity of scrap sales sufficient to establish an intention to carry on business in such goods. The sales of discarded material were only incidental to the primary statutory activity and did not amount to an independent commercial venture.
Conclusion: The corporation was not carrying on "business" within the meaning of the Act and was not a "dealer"; the sale of scrap and unserviceable material was not exigible to sales tax.