Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court includes canteen sales in turnover for sales tax assessment, profit motive irrelevant</h1> <h3>The Hyderabad Asbestos Cement Products Limited and Another Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others</h3> The court upheld the inclusion of canteen sales in the turnover for sales tax assessment, emphasizing that the profit motive was irrelevant under the ... - Issues Involved:1. Inclusion of canteen sales in turnover for sales tax assessment.2. Definition and interpretation of 'business' under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act.3. Compulsion to provide canteen services under the Factories Act and its impact on the characterization of sales.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Inclusion of Canteen Sales in Turnover for Sales Tax Assessment:The petitioner, Hyderabad Allwyn Metal Works Limited, argued that sales at the canteen should not be included in their turnover for sales tax purposes, as these sales were not part of their 'business' but were made to comply with statutory requirements under the Factories Act. The Commercial Tax Officer disagreed and included the canteen sales in the turnover, a decision upheld by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash this inclusion.2. Definition and Interpretation of 'Business' under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act:The court traced the legislative history and judicial precedents to understand the definition of 'business.' Initially, under the Madras General Sales Tax Act of 1939 and the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act of 1950, 'business' was not defined, but 'sale' and 'dealer' were defined in a way that implied a profit motive. Judicial precedents, such as Gannon Dunkerley and Co. v. The State of Madras and Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. State of Madras, held that 'business' involved an activity to earn profit. However, the definition was amended in 1966 to include activities 'whether or not such trade, commerce, manufacture, adventure or concern is carried on with a motive to make gain or profit.' The court held that the amended definition made the profit motive immaterial, and thus, the supply of food and drink at the canteen constituted 'business' under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act.3. Compulsion to Provide Canteen Services under the Factories Act and Its Impact on the Characterization of Sales:The petitioner contended that the sales were 'compulsory' due to statutory obligations and could not be considered as voluntary business activities. The court rejected this argument, stating that compliance with the law does not negate the intention to conduct the activity. The court referred to various Supreme Court decisions, including New India Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Bihar, and Andhra Sugars Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, which clarified that statutory compulsion does not preclude the existence of a contract of sale. The court noted that the transactions between the company and its workers involved mutual assent and privity of contract, fulfilling the requirements of a sale under the Sale of Goods Act.The court also examined the Factories Act and the relevant Rules, which mandated the provision of a canteen but allowed discretion in the choice of food, pricing, and management. The court concluded that the transactions in the canteen were sales and constituted business for the purposes of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act.Conclusion:The writ petitions were dismissed, and the court upheld the inclusion of canteen sales in the turnover for sales tax assessment. The court emphasized that the amended definition of 'business' under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act made the profit motive irrelevant, and statutory compulsion to provide canteen services did not negate the characterization of these transactions as sales. The petitioner was ordered to pay costs, including an advocate's fee of Rs. 100 in each case.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found