Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer permitted to file annual returns under the State sales tax law could be compelled to file monthly returns under the Central Sales Tax (Tamil Nadu) Rules, and whether the impugned order refusing annual CST returns was liable to be quashed.
Analysis: Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 makes the State sales tax machinery applicable for assessment, reassessment, collection and enforcement of CST liability, including provisions relating to returns and provisional assessment. Rule 11 of the Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957 ties the period of turnover under the CST regime to the period in which the dealer is liable to submit returns under the general sales tax law of the appropriate State. Since the dealer had been permitted to submit annual returns under the State law, the CST return period had to follow the same basis. In that situation, rule 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax (Tamil Nadu) Rules could not be used to insist upon monthly returns, and the challenge to its vires became unnecessary to decide.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to file CST returns annually, and the order refusing that permission was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 applies, the CST return and assessment machinery follows the State sales tax return period, so the dealer's CST return frequency must conform to the State law period of return liability.