Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales made outside the State on consignment basis could be taxed under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, in view of section 29(1)(a), and whether the assessment orders sustaining such tax could stand to that extent.
Analysis: Section 29 begins with a non obstante clause and expressly provides that tax on the sale or purchase of goods shall not be imposed where the sale or purchase takes place outside the State. The provision was treated as overriding the charging machinery and the definitions relied upon for bringing such sales into the taxable turnover. On that construction, sales effected outside the State could not lawfully be included for assessment under the Act.
Conclusion: The tax on sales made outside the State was not leviable under section 29(1)(a), and the assessment orders were liable to be interfered with to that extent.
Final Conclusion: The challenge succeeded only in part, with the impugned orders set aside insofar as they sustained tax on outside-State sales.
Ratio Decidendi: A non obstante provision excluding tax on sales taking place outside the State overrides the charging and turnover provisions of the sales tax law, and such sales cannot be brought to tax by assessment under that Act.