<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 246 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153943</link>
    <description>A non obstante provision in section 29 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 was treated as overriding the charging and turnover provisions so that sales taking place outside the State could not be subjected to tax under the Act. On that construction, consignment sales made outside the State were excluded from taxable turnover, and assessment orders could not lawfully sustain tax on such sales to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:12:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=170977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 246 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153943</link>
      <description>A non obstante provision in section 29 of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 was treated as overriding the charging and turnover provisions so that sales taking place outside the State could not be subjected to tax under the Act. On that construction, consignment sales made outside the State were excluded from taxable turnover, and assessment orders could not lawfully sustain tax on such sales to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=153943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>